MCEC School Survey 2020 We kindly ask you to fill in this survey. Please note that all responses will be anonymous. Q1: To what level were you satisfied with the Digital Format of the MCEC School 2020?*Very SatisfiedSatisfiedUnsatisfiedVery UnsatisfiedQ2: Do you have suggestions for improvement (concerning the use of MS Teams as a platform for example)?*NoYesMy suggestion would be:*Q3: Please indicate which track you followed:*Catalysis & MaterialsFluid Mechanics & EngineeringQ4: Fluid Mechanics & Engineering LecturesMonday Lecture 1These questions concern lecture 1: Mass transport for Membrane Technology (by Prof. Rob Lammertink)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Appeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableMonday Lecture 2These questions concern lecture 2: Convection-Diffusion-Reaction systems (by Dr. Ivo Filot and Dr. Maike Baltussen)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Appeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableTuesday Lecture 3These questions concern lecture 3: Industrial Catalysis (by Prof. Eelco Vogt)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableAppeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableTuesday Lecture 4These questions concern lecture 4: Nanofluidics (by Prof. Jan Eijkel)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableAppeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableWednesday Lecture 5These questions concern lecture 5: Reaction Kinetics for Reactor Engineering (by Dr. Fernanda Neira d’Angelo)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableAppeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableQ4: Catalysis & Materials LecturesMonday Lecture 1These questions concern lecture 1: Mass transport for Membrane Technology (By Prof. Rob Lammertink)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableAppeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableMonday Lecture 2These questions concern lecture 2: Electrochemistry (by Dr. Ward van der Stam)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableAppeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableTuesday Lecture 3These questions concern lecture 3: Industrial Catalysis (by Prof. Eelco Vogt)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableAppeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableTuesday Lecture 4These questions concern lecture 4: Nanofluidics (by Prof. Jan Eijkel)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableAppeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableWednesday Lecture 5These questions concern lecture 5: Advanced Characterization (by Dr. Florian Meirer)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableAppeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableQ5: Lecture WednesdayResearch lectureThese questions concern research lecture 1 (by Dr. Freddy Rabouw)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableDifficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableAppeal (the content was interesting):*1 (not at all)2345 (very much)Not applicableQ6: Did the lectures provide a good balance between overview and specifics of the fields*YesNoQ7: Was the set-up of the lectures coherent?*YesNoQ8: Was the duration of the lectures appropriate?*YesNo, I would have preferred longer sessionsNo, I would have preferred shorter sessionsQ9: To what level were you satisfied with the teamwork? (during PhD teaches PhD on Tuesday)*Very SatisfiedSatisfiedUnsatisfiedVery UnsatisfiedQ10: Do you have suggestions for specific subjects for a next MCEC meeting?*NoYesMy suggestion would be:*Q11: Were there sufficient breaks?*Yes, plenty of timeTo some extentNot quite enough timeNo, there was not enough timeQ12: Do you have suggestions for (networking) activities we can organize next time?*NoYesMy suggestion would be:*Q13: What's your opinion on the activities organized by Team Community?*Q14: To what level were you satisfied overall with the MCEC School 2020?*Very SatisfiedSatisfiedUnsatisfiedVery UnsatisfiedQ15: Will you benefit from this training for your own project?*Yes, very much soTo some extentNot that muchNot at allQ16: Could you list three things that you liked the most about MCEC School 2020:*Q17: Do you have suggestions on things that could be improved, other than the ones you've already mentioned?*