MCEC School Survey 2020 We kindly ask you to fill in this survey. Please note that all responses will be anonymous. Q1: To what level were you satisfied with the Digital Format of the MCEC School 2020?* Very Satisfied Satisfied Unsatisfied Very Unsatisfied Q2: Do you have suggestions for improvement (concerning the use of MS Teams as a platform for example)?* No Yes My suggestion would be:*Q3: Please indicate which track you followed:* Catalysis & Materials Fluid Mechanics & Engineering Q4: Fluid Mechanics & Engineering LecturesMonday Lecture 1These questions concern lecture 1: Mass transport for Membrane Technology (by Prof. Rob Lammertink)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Monday Lecture 2These questions concern lecture 2: Convection-Diffusion-Reaction systems (by Dr. Ivo Filot and Dr. Maike Baltussen)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Tuesday Lecture 3These questions concern lecture 3: Industrial Catalysis (by Prof. Eelco Vogt)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Tuesday Lecture 4These questions concern lecture 4: Nanofluidics (by Prof. Jan Eijkel)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Wednesday Lecture 5These questions concern lecture 5: Reaction Kinetics for Reactor Engineering (by Dr. Fernanda Neira d’Angelo)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Q4: Catalysis & Materials LecturesMonday Lecture 1These questions concern lecture 1: Mass transport for Membrane Technology (By Prof. Rob Lammertink)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Monday Lecture 2These questions concern lecture 2: Electrochemistry (by Dr. Ward van der Stam)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Tuesday Lecture 3These questions concern lecture 3: Industrial Catalysis (by Prof. Eelco Vogt)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Tuesday Lecture 4These questions concern lecture 4: Nanofluidics (by Prof. Jan Eijkel)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Wednesday Lecture 5These questions concern lecture 5: Advanced Characterization (by Dr. Florian Meirer)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Q5: Lecture WednesdayResearch lectureThese questions concern research lecture 1 (by Dr. Freddy Rabouw)Familiarity (I'm familiar with content presented:)* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Difficulty (I was able to fully comprehend the content):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Appeal (the content was interesting):* 1 (not at all) 2 3 4 5 (very much) Not applicable Q6: Did the lectures provide a good balance between overview and specifics of the fields* Yes No Q7: Was the set-up of the lectures coherent?* Yes No Q8: Was the duration of the lectures appropriate?* Yes No, I would have preferred longer sessions No, I would have preferred shorter sessions Q9: To what level were you satisfied with the teamwork? (during PhD teaches PhD on Tuesday)* Very Satisfied Satisfied Unsatisfied Very Unsatisfied Q10: Do you have suggestions for specific subjects for a next MCEC meeting?* No Yes My suggestion would be:*Q11: Were there sufficient breaks?* Yes, plenty of time To some extent Not quite enough time No, there was not enough time Q12: Do you have suggestions for (networking) activities we can organize next time?* No Yes My suggestion would be:*Q13: What's your opinion on the activities organized by Team Community?*Q14: To what level were you satisfied overall with the MCEC School 2020?* Very Satisfied Satisfied Unsatisfied Very Unsatisfied Q15: Will you benefit from this training for your own project?* Yes, very much so To some extent Not that much Not at all Q16: Could you list three things that you liked the most about MCEC School 2020:*Q17: Do you have suggestions on things that could be improved, other than the ones you've already mentioned?*